What if the price of gas is really a plan by the Oil Companies including the British to continue to raise the price of crude oil (which increases price of gas and all other products using some form of oil as a base) to 15 dollars a gallon.
What if they are doing this in order to get the public to go along with their plans for
offshore oil exploration?
What if this is a collusion between the oil cartels and the arabs to bring this about?
What if we look back to the 70's and the spokesman for the oil companies said there would be a shortage of oil until gas was Three Dollars a gallon at the pump?
What if we missed the impact of that statement which has come true?
What if he was really telling us that unless we paid what they (the oil companies) wanted we would have to suffer by increased prices and damage to our economy?
What if McCain is really the spokesperson for the Oil Industry who has conned him into believing that if they were allowed to set up as many offshore platforms as they wanted to inorder to get us off foreign oil?
What if there really is enough oil right here in the U.S. to fulfill our needs but the Oil Industry doesn't want the cost of American Labor?
What if the reason we deal with the Arabs is becuase they provide cheap labor to drill for and maintain the oil fields?
What if all the above What if's are wrong but
What if the proof seems to support it by reason of the fact that the Oil Companies do not want car manufacturers to build a gas engine to have an out put of 40 to 50 miles per gallon and
What if there are such engines now in existence in Japan that can do it but are not being imported here?
What if the oil companies give lip talk to "alternative fuels but really do not want it and proof of that is they have not invested significantly in technology and they have not. There is not a single advertisement from the big oil cartel showing what they are doing to develop alternative means of energy other than oil and
lastly What if, Nuclear power can be made safe and technology could bring its benefits to mankind by delivering our fuel energy needs at a fraction of the cost but such exploration has been hindered by big Oil?
Just imagine all the other What if's exist and maybe some are really true?
7 comments on What if?
Add a comment
To add comments without entering your email and image verification, you must be logged in. Login or Join Blogster
If these conjectures all materialize, then the conspirators are short-sighted. With the price of gasoline at barely $4.00/gal the U.S. governemt has already been taking a dose of Viagra to get up its courage in the quest for alternative fuels. This particular hardening of commitment is largely psychological, but there are tangible effects of high oil prices as well. So long as prices were kept "within reason" competing fuels could not compete. The upfront cost of, say, solar panels to replace home heating by fossil fuel-based methods was a hard pill to swallow. But with the price of heating oil now soaring beyond the threshhold where due diligence would point to a change, solar panels become comparatively more affordable. Like any technology-based product, as their usage increases, their prices will fall.
Thus the price of oil is in some respects (but not all) determined the same as the price of toothpaste, supply and demand. The problem in the recent past was that all of oil's competitors were more expensive than oil. But if your "if's" come true, oil will find competition coming out of the woodwork. And that, too, is the American way (at its finest).
Of course, Big Oil is as aware as I am of these facts. OPEC, for instance, has always managed to control the price of its product just below the level at which the competition was able to get off the ground. It's entirely possible, however, that the price of oil has gotten beyond OPEC's ability to control it. Speculation seems now to rule, but if the bubble doesn't burst too soon, we may find that the out-of-control prices have rendered a great service. The pain of inflated oil prices may put starch in the "organ's" of government, hence (IMO) Obama's rejection of McCain's shorterm paliatives. We need the pain to keep us focused on long-term change. (But don't say that too loud or JoeZrepublican will call you a ****ing communist.)
Paul Pantone developed "GEET" technology. He was stifled and thrown into a mental institution where he still is today. His invention would have eliminated pollution from automobiles with only modifying the carburetor.
There are MANY ionstances of stifling inventions to protect the industries they jeopardize as is shown in the first link below.
http://www.himacresearch.com/docs/geet.html
http://geet-pantone.com/
http://www.geetfriends.net/
But of course. It is the meetig of two great aphorisms:
A. Necessity is the mother of invention.
B. Costs will always and only rise to the level of what the market will bear.
Unfortunately (and to Joez credit he recognizes this) our government, because of its socialist trend, believes it can force markets to behave against economic nature. By these policies it is destroying our economy. If the American People hope to save prosperity and freedom they must begin by taking back our economic free will. There is a way. (Next Post)
So, nobull, I take it we agree, at least on market forces. Now go read my blog on the price of tomatoes.
Exactly!
Unless there is a deliberate attempt to deabse our currency in order to manipulate popular opinion. This would cripple people with fear and then miraculously the NAU and the "Amero" currency can be our savior!
I've been saying for the past couple of years that I suspect something of the sort by the powers that be because the American people will not go for that on their own as it currently stands (back then's current time and mental perspective).
Time will tell.
Also, Paul Pantone developed "GEET" technology. He was stifled and thrown into a mental institution where he still is today. His invention would have eliminated pollution from automobiles with only modifying the carburetor.
There are MANY ionstances of stifling inventions to protect the industries they jeopardize as is shown in the first link below.
http://www.himacresearch.com/docs/geet.html
http://geet-pantone.com/
http://www.geetfriends.net/
I love you what ifs!
Paul Pantone developed "GEET" technology. He was stifled and thrown into a mental institution where is still is today. His invention would have eliminated pollution from automobiles with only modifying the carburetor.
http://www.himacresearch.com/docs/geet.html
http://geet-pantone.com/
http://www.geetfriends.net/